AerospacePrep logo AerospacePrep CAsP Aerospace Physiology Board Review

Space Physiology & Microgravity

Space MedicineSection II8.8% of exam44 objectives

Study Space Physiology & Microgravity interactively →Practice questions, flashcards, figures, and progress tracking in the full AerospacePrep app

SECTION TWO

Human Performance in Extreme Environments

CHAPTER 12 | SPACE PHYSIOLOGY AND MICROGRAVITY

Bone Loss, Radiation, Muscle Atrophy, Neurovestibular, Cardiovascular & Motion Sickness — CAsP Unit 12 Objectives 1–44

Human spaceflight removes the physiological anchors of Earth-based life — gravity, mechanical loading, the day-night cycle — and adds the hazard of space radiation. The result is a predictable set of deconditioning syndromes: bone demineralization, muscle atrophy, cardiovascular deconditioning, neurovestibular re-adaptation, and space motion sickness. This chapter covers all 44 CAsP Unit 12 objectives across six topic areas.

SECTION A: BONE LOSS IN MICROGRAVITY (Objectives 12.1–12.9)

Objective 12.1

Compare the long-term level of bone loss in microgravity to the long-term recovery of bone once an individual returns to Earth’s gravity.

  • Rate of loss: Approximately 1–2% bone mineral density (BMD) per MONTH in weight-bearing bones. This is 10–12× faster than terrestrial bed rest and comparable to the worst postmenopausal osteoporosis on an annualized basis.
  • Most affected regions (Mir data, 4–6 month missions): Femoral trochanter −11%; calcaneus −7%; pelvis −7%; femoral neck −6%; lumbar spine −1% (lumbar losses continued postflight for up to 6 months while other regions recovered).
  • Gender: Terrestrial gender differences in bone loss (women > men) are markedly reduced in space — both sexes lose bone at approximately the same rate, confirming mechanical unloading as the dominant driver.
  • Recovery: Up to 2 years for BMD recovery; not all subjects fully recover (5/7 subjects in one Mir study). Elevated fracture risk during recovery compounded by muscle weakness and vestibular ataxia.
High-Yield Summary
  • Bone loss: ~1–2% BMD/month (weight-bearing bones). 10–12× faster than bed rest.
  • Most affected: Femoral trochanter (−11%), calcaneus (−7%), pelvis (−7%), femoral neck (−6%).
  • Gender equalization in space: Both sexes lose bone at similar rates.
  • Recovery: Up to 2 years; incomplete in some. Elevated fracture risk during recovery.
Objective 12.2

Describe the effects of increased carbon dioxide on bone metabolism and acid-base balance.

Even at sub-toxic spacecraft CO₂ levels (≤0.5%), chronically elevated CO₂ drives respiratory acidosis. Bone mineral (hydroxyapatite) acts as a carbonate buffer for the acidosis — osteoclastic resorption increases to release calcium carbonate and neutralize the acid load. This accelerates bone demineralization beyond the mechanical unloading effect alone.

  • Hypercalciuria: Released calcium appears in the urine, used as a real-time biomarker of bone resorption during spaceflight. Also increases kidney stone risk — a recognized long-duration spaceflight complication.
High-Yield Summary
  • Elevated CO₂ → respiratory acidosis → bone as acid buffer → ↑ osteoclastic resorption → ↑ bone loss + hypercalciuria.
  • Hypercalciuria: Bone resorption biomarker + kidney stone risk.
Objective 12.3

Describe the body’s negative feedback response to a decrease in dietary calcium levels.

  • ↓ dietary Ca²⁺ → ↓ serum ionized Ca²⁺.
  • Parathyroid glands detect fall → ↑ PTH secretion.
  • PTH acts on: (a) Bone — stimulates osteoclasts to resorb bone, releasing Ca²⁺; (b) Kidney — ↑ tubular Ca²⁺ reabsorption + stimulates 1-α-hydroxylase to produce calcitriol (active Vitamin D); (c) Intestine — calcitriol ↑ intestinal Ca²⁺ absorption.
  • Serum Ca²⁺ restored → PTH secretion falls (negative feedback).

Spaceflight paradox: Bone resorption (from unloading) chronically elevates serum Ca²⁺ → PTH suppressed → calcitriol ↓ → intestinal Ca²⁺ absorption ↓. High serum Ca²⁺ but poor dietary calcium utilization.

High-Yield Summary
  • Ca²⁺ negative feedback: ↓ serum Ca²⁺ → ↑ PTH → ↑ bone resorption + ↑ renal Ca²⁺ retention + ↑ calcitriol → ↑ intestinal absorption → Ca²⁺ restored.
  • Spaceflight paradox: Bone resorption ↑ serum Ca²⁺ → PTH suppressed → ↓ calcitriol → ↓ intestinal Ca²⁺ absorption despite hypercalcemia.
Objective 12.4

List the primary factors involved in bone loss when chronically exposed to microgravity.

  • Absent mechanical loading (most important): Osteocyte mechanosensors detect no strain → osteoblast activity decreases; osteoclast activity continues → net resorption.
  • Muscle atrophy: Reduced muscle contractile forces on bone compound the unloading effect.
  • Reduced Vitamin D synthesis: No UVB penetrates spacecraft hull → no cutaneous Vit D synthesis → ↓ calcitriol → ↓ intestinal Ca²⁺ absorption.
  • Elevated CO₂: Acidosis drives bone dissolution as acid buffer.
  • Altered hormonal environment: Fluid shifts, elevated cortisol, circadian disruption impair bone metabolism.
  • Sedentary state: Reduced metabolic demand limits mechano-stimulation.
High-Yield Summary
  • Primary factors: (1) Absent mechanical loading (most important); (2) Muscle atrophy; (3) ↓ Vitamin D (no UVB); (4) Elevated CO₂ (acid buffer); (5) Altered hormones; (6) Sedentary state.
Objective 12.5

Describe how microgravity affects loading of the skeleton.

In microgravity, gravitational compressive load = 0. Bones evolved to support 70–80 kg of body weight carry no weight at all. Weight-bearing bones (vertebrae, femur, tibia, calcaneus, pelvis) are most affected. Upper extremity and skull bones, which are not primarily gravity-loaded, are relatively spared. Some astronauts performing extensive EVA work show minimal arm bone loss or slight hypertrophy.

High-Yield Summary
  • Microgravity: Gravitational compressive load = 0 → osteoblast activity falls → net bone loss.
  • Most affected: Weight-bearing bones. Least affected: Non-weight-bearing (wrist, skull, upper extremity).
Objective 12.6

List dietary factors that influence bone metabolism.

  • Calcium: 1,200–1,500 mg/day — essential for mineralization.
  • Vitamin D: 800–1,200 IU/day — essential for intestinal Ca²⁺ absorption.
  • Phosphorus: High intake ↑ PTH → ↑ bone resorption. Keep intake low relative to calcium.
  • Protein: Adequate required for collagen matrix; excess increases urinary Ca²⁺ loss.
  • Sodium: High intake promotes urinary Ca²⁺ excretion. Low-sodium is bone-protective.
  • Vitamin K: Required for osteocalcin carboxylation (calcium binding in bone).
  • Alcohol and caffeine: Both increase urinary Ca²⁺ excretion. Detrimental in excess.
High-Yield Summary
  • Bone-protective diet: Ca 1,200–1,500 mg + Vit D 800–1,200 IU + adequate protein + Vit K + low Na + low phosphorus + ↓ alcohol/caffeine.
Objective 12.7

Describe the effects of the low light level in space on Vitamin D and calcium levels.

Spacecraft materials block all UVB radiation (290–315 nm) → no cutaneous Vitamin D synthesis. Without UVB → ↓ calcitriol → ↓ intestinal Ca²⁺ absorption → PTH rises → bone resorption increases. Oral Vitamin D supplementation (800–1,200 IU/day) is mandatory in spaceflight nutrition protocols.

High-Yield Summary
  • Spacecraft blocks UVB → zero cutaneous Vit D synthesis → ↓ calcitriol → ↓ intestinal Ca²⁺ → ↑ PTH → ↑ bone resorption.
  • Countermeasure: Oral Vit D supplementation 800–1,200 IU/day (mandatory).
Objective 12.8

Identify exercise countermeasures that could be employed during spaceflight to prevent bone loss.

  • Resistive exercise (ARED — most effective): High-force muscular contractions apply compressive and tensile loads to bone, partially replicating terrestrial mechanical stimulation. ISS Advanced Resistive Exercise Device provides up to 600 lbs simulated load via vacuum cylinder. Resistive > aerobic for bone preservation.
  • Aerobic exercise (treadmill + harness, cycle ergometer): Some bone loading benefit but insufficient alone (Skylab, Mir data: aerobic exercise did not prevent significant bone loss).
  • Vibration (LMHF): Low-magnitude high-frequency vibration under investigation; promising in bed rest models.
  • Pharmacological (under investigation): Bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate) block osteoclast activity; show promise in bed rest studies.
High-Yield Summary
  • Best bone exercise countermeasure: Resistive exercise (ARED; up to 600 lbs). Aerobic alone insufficient.
  • Bisphosphonates: Pharmacological countermeasure under investigation.
Objective 12.9

Identify the recommended diet for optimizing bone health while exposed to microgravity.

  • Calcium: 1,200–1,500 mg/day.
  • Vitamin D: 800–1,200 IU/day.
  • Adequate protein (0.8–1.2 g/kg/day); not excessive.
  • Low sodium (<2,300 mg/day).
  • Adequate Vitamin K.
  • Low phosphorus-to-calcium ratio; avoid sodas/processed foods.
  • Adequate total calories (anorexia from SMS/workload accelerates muscle/bone loss).
High-Yield Summary
  • Space bone diet: Ca 1,200–1,500 mg + Vit D 800–1,200 IU + adequate protein/Vit K/calories + low Na/phosphorus/alcohol/caffeine.

SECTION B: RADIATION HAZARDS IN SPACE (Objectives 12.10–12.19)

Objective 12.10

Define ionizing radiation.

Ionizing radiation is electromagnetic or particle radiation with sufficient energy to remove electrons from atoms, creating ions. Ionization of biological molecules (DNA, proteins, lipids) is the mechanism of biological damage. Types: electromagnetic (X-rays, gamma rays) and particulate (alpha particles, beta particles, neutrons, high-energy heavy nuclei).

High-Yield Summary
  • Ionizing radiation: Sufficient energy to ionize atoms. Electromagnetic (X-ray, gamma) or particulate (alpha, beta, neutrons, HZE nuclei).
Objective 12.11

Describe the difference between radiation with X-rays and radiation with high energy particles.

  • X-rays (low LET, sparsely ionizing): Photons deposit energy in widely spaced ion pairs. Multiple photons needed for lethal DNA damage. Effectively shielded by dense material (lead). The terrestrial radiation model.
  • HZE particles (high LET, densely ionizing): A single iron nucleus (from GCR) deposits enough energy along its track to sever both DNA strands simultaneously and destroy multiple cellular structures in a linear ‘scar.’ This dense ionization cluster is far more difficult to repair than sparse X-ray ionization. Dense shielding can WORSEN HZE dose by producing secondary radiation showers (neutron fragments).
High-Yield Summary
  • X-rays: Low LET; sparse ionization; easily shielded; terrestrial model.
  • HZE particles: High LET; dense ionization; single particle causes complex double-strand breaks; difficult to repair; shielding can backfire (secondary shower).
Objective 12.12

Identify primary sources of radiation in space.

  • Galactic Cosmic Radiation (GCR): Originates outside solar system (supernovae). ~85% protons, 14% alpha, 1% HZE nuclei (iron of greatest biological concern). Omnidirectional; cannot be practically shielded. Highest during solar minimum. Primary deep space concern.
  • Solar Particle Events (SPE): Episodic proton/electron bursts from coronal mass ejections. Acute high dose in hours to days. More shieldable than GCR. Primary acute radiation hazard.
  • Van Allen Belt trapped radiation: Inner belt (protons; 1,000–5,000 km) + outer belt (electrons; 15,000–25,000 km). ISS orbits below at ~400 km but transits the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) where inner belt dips lower.
High-Yield Summary
  • Primary sources: GCR (HZE; omnidirectional; deep space) + SPE (protons; acute; shieldable) + Van Allen Belts (trapped protons/electrons; ISS: SAA transits).
Objective 12.13

Identify the most important factor in the ability of radiation to cause damaging biological effects.

LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER (LET; keV/μm) is the most important factor. Higher LET = denser ionization along the particle track = more complex clustered DNA damage = greater biological effect per unit energy deposited. High LET produces double-strand DNA breaks in close proximity that overwhelm normal repair pathways.

High-Yield Summary
  • Most important factor: LET (linear energy transfer). Higher LET → denser ionization → complex DNA damage → greater biological harm per unit energy.
Objective 12.14

Define relative biologic effectiveness (RBE).

RBE = (dose of 250 kV X-rays to produce a given effect) / (dose of test radiation to produce the same effect). X-rays: RBE = 1.0 (reference). Alpha particles: RBE ≈20. Fast neutrons: 5–20. HZE particles: up to 30+ for carcinogenesis endpoints. Dose equivalent (Sieverts) = absorbed dose (Grays) × radiation weighting factor (which approximates RBE for protection purposes).

High-Yield Summary
  • RBE = dose of reference X-rays / dose of test radiation (for same effect). High LET → high RBE (alpha ~20; fast neutrons 5–20).
  • Dose equivalent (Sv) = absorbed dose (Gy) × radiation weighting factor.
Objective 12.15

Explain the importance of free radicals in the biological effects of radiation.

~70% of radiation biological damage is INDIRECT, mediated by free radicals from water radiolysis. Ionizing radiation → ionizes H₂O → produces hydroxyl radical (•OH; most damaging), superoxide (O₂•⁻), and H₂O₂. The hydroxyl radical reacts with DNA (strand breaks, base oxidation), proteins, and membrane lipids within nanometers to micrometers of its formation site. Antioxidants (Vitamins C, E, NAC) partially counteract •OH but are less effective for high-LET direct ionization.

High-Yield Summary
  • ~70% of radiation damage: Indirect via •OH from water radiolysis. ~30%: Direct ionization of biomolecules.
  • Hydroxyl radical (•OH): Most damaging species; reacts with DNA/proteins/lipids.
Objective 12.16

List the long-term health effects of radiation exposure in space.

  • Carcinogenesis (primary concern): NASA career limit: <3% excess lifetime cancer mortality risk (REID). Cancers: lung, breast, colon, stomach, bladder, leukemia, thyroid.
  • Cataracts: Lens is radiosensitive; HZE component particularly cataractogenic. Documented in astronauts.
  • CNS effects: HZE particles cause direct neuronal damage, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation → cognitive impairment, reduced neurogenesis (animal data). Primary deep space mission concern.
  • Cardiovascular disease: Radiation-associated endothelial damage and atherosclerosis acceleration. Some astronaut mortality analyses suggest elevated cardiovascular risk.
  • Hereditary effects: Germline mutations; relatively low risk compared to cancer.
High-Yield Summary
  • Long-term effects: Cancer (primary; <3% REID limit) + Cataracts + CNS effects (deep space concern) + Cardiovascular disease + Hereditary effects (low relative risk).
Objective 12.17

Describe the adaptive response to radiation and how it relates to DNA repair ability.

Low-dose radiation priming (≤0.2 Gy) activates DNA repair enzymes (BER, NER, DSBR pathways), antioxidant enzymes, and apoptotic pathways via p53/NF-κB transcription factors, increasing resistance to subsequent higher doses. DNA repair capacity is the key determinant of individual radiation sensitivity. Impaired repair (ATM, BRCA2 mutations) = higher cancer risk. Adaptive response primarily demonstrated for low-LET radiation; less effective for HZE particles whose complex clustered damage exceeds normal repair capacity.

High-Yield Summary
  • Radiation adaptive response: Low-dose priming → upregulates DNA repair + antioxidant + apoptotic pathways → ↑ resistance.
  • DNA repair capacity = key determinant of radiation sensitivity. ATM/BRCA2 mutations → high sensitivity.
Objective 12.18

Describe the main radiation risks associated with long duration low earth orbit flights.

ISS crews at ~400 km altitude receive ~0.5–1.5 mSv/day (150–500 mSv per 6-month mission). Primary sources: GCR (steady background; unshieldable majority of dose) + SAA transits (peak dose spikes) + SPE risk (acute if caught unshielded) + EVA (substantially increased exposure outside the spacecraft hull). EVA timing is managed to avoid known SPE periods.

High-Yield Summary
  • ISS radiation: ~0.5–1.5 mSv/day; 150–500 mSv per 6-month mission. GCR + SAA transits + SPE risk + EVA (highest per-hour exposure).
Objective 12.19

List countermeasures for radiation hazards.

  • Shielding: Water/polyethylene (high H content) for SPE proton protection. Dense metals (aluminum) produce more secondary radiation from HZE particles. Crew storm shelters (water-wall sleeping quarters) provide SPE protection on ISS.
  • Mission planning: Schedule deep space missions during solar maximum (lower GCR). Minimize EVA during SPE periods.
  • Dose monitoring: Personal dosimeters (TLD, TEPC) for real-time and cumulative dose tracking. Career limits management.
  • Pharmacological: Antioxidants (Vit C, E, NAC); G-CSF for post-acute-exposure bone marrow recovery. No approved drug fully prevents HZE carcinogenesis.
  • NASA career dose limits: <3% excess lifetime cancer mortality risk (REID); age- and sex-specific.
High-Yield Summary
  • Radiation countermeasures: Shielding (H-rich for SPE) + Mission timing (solar max for GCR min) + Dosimetry + Antioxidants + G-CSF (post-exposure) + Career limits (<3% REID).

SECTION C: MUSCLE LOSS IN MICROGRAVITY (Objectives 12.20–12.22)

Objective 12.20

Identify the skeletal muscles that experience the most muscle volume loss following chronic exposure to microgravity.

Muscle atrophy in microgravity preferentially affects anti-gravity postural muscles of the lower extremity and trunk. Studies document 15–20% total volume loss after 6-month ISS missions in:

  • Soleus (most affected — highest slow Type I fiber ratio; primary anti-gravity function).
  • Gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior.
  • Quadriceps (especially vastus intermedius), hamstrings.
  • Erector spinae (lumbar extensors).

Upper extremity muscles (deltoid, biceps, forearm) are relatively spared — actively used for ISS operations and EVA activities.

High-Yield Summary
  • Greatest loss: Anti-gravity muscles — Soleus (most), gastrocnemius, quadriceps, hamstrings, erector spinae. 15–20% volume after 6 months.
  • Least affected: Upper extremity (still used for ISS operations and EVA).
Objective 12.21

Describe factors other than microgravity that contribute to muscular atrophy during space travel.

  • Reduced caloric intake: SMS, altered food palatability, workload → energy deficit → catabolism.
  • Reduced IGF-1 (anabolic): Insulin-like growth factor 1 decreases in microgravity → reduced protein synthesis signaling (mTOR pathway impaired).
  • Elevated cortisol (catabolic): Confinement stress, workload, sleep disruption, circadian disruption → elevated cortisol → muscle protein catabolism.
  • Oxidative stress: Radiation and mitochondrial dysfunction → ROS accumulation → damages muscle proteins and mitochondria.
  • Sleep/circadian disruption: 16 sunrises/day on ISS → circadian disruption → impaired slow-wave sleep → ↓ growth hormone → ↓ protein synthesis.
High-Yield Summary
  • Non-microgravity contributors: ↓ caloric intake + ↓ IGF-1 + ↑ cortisol + oxidative stress + circadian disruption (↓ GH).
Objective 12.22

Describe the basic principles for strength training to attenuate muscular atrophy in microgravity.

  • High load (≥70–80% 1RM): Required to activate mTOR/IGF-1 hypertrophy signaling and counteract atrophy. Light aerobic exercise is insufficient.
  • Multi-joint compound exercises: Squat, deadlift, row equivalents engaging multiple postural muscle groups simultaneously.
  • Eccentric loading: Eccentric contractions produce greater mechanical tension per unit metabolic cost → potent protein synthesis stimulus. ARED permits both concentric and eccentric loading.
  • Frequency: ISS protocol: 6 days/week combined aerobic + resistive exercise, ~2.5 hours/day.
  • Specificity: Must target the most vulnerable muscles (soleus, quadriceps, erector spinae) — upper body exercise does not protect lower body postural muscles.
High-Yield Summary
  • Space strength training principles: High load (≥70–80% 1RM) + Compound exercises (squat/deadlift) + Eccentric loading + 6 days/week + Specific targeting of postural muscles.
  • ISS: ARED (Advanced Resistive Exercise Device; up to 600 lbs via vacuum cylinder).

SECTION D: NEUROVESTIBULAR EFFECTS (Objectives 12.23–12.27)

Objective 12.23

State the main effect of space flight on the vestibular system.

The primary effect is the REMOVAL of the gravitational reference signal from the otolith organs. On Earth, the constant 1-G force on the otoconia provides the stable gravitational vertical anchor for the CNS orientation model. In microgravity, this signal disappears — the otoliths can no longer define a gravitational vertical, and the CNS’s internal model (calibrated to 1-G over a lifetime) must fundamentally re-adapt to a 0-G reference frame.

High-Yield Summary
  • Main effect: Loss of gravitational otolith reference signal → CNS orientation model loses gravity anchor → sensory conflict → SMS + vestibular re-adaptation.
Objective 12.24

Describe the plasticity of balance control system in microgravity.

The balance control system demonstrates remarkable neuroplasticity in 0-G:

  • Early adaptation (days 1–6): SMS most severe. Canal-otolith conflict + visual-vestibular conflict from novel 0-G environment.
  • Progressive adaptation (weeks): CNS down-weights otolith signals (unreliable gravity reference) and re-weights canal + visual inputs. Vestibular nuclei and cerebellum recalibrate processing.
  • Re-adaptation on return to Earth: Now-space-adapted system encounters 1-G → postural instability, gait ataxia, enhanced tilt perception for days to weeks.
High-Yield Summary
  • Neuroplasticity: CNS down-weights otolith (unreliable), re-weights canal + visual signals. Takes days to weeks.
  • Re-adaptation required on return: Reverse the 0-G adaptation back to 1-G.
Objective 12.25

Describe the effects of weightlessness on an astronaut’s ability to sense lateral acceleration and roll after returning to Earth’s gravitational field.

After adaptation to 0-G, the internal model expects no gravitational otolith contribution. On return to Earth:

  • Enhanced (exaggerated) tilt perception: The restored gravitational signal is ‘unexpected’ by the 0-G-adapted CNS. Even modest head tilts produce a much larger perceived tilt than actually occurred — the space analog of G-excess effect.
  • Impaired lateral acceleration perception: Inconsistent otolith interpretation during translational movement → tilt illusions during lateral movement.
  • Postural instability: Vestibulospinal reflexes re-calibrated to 0-G produce inappropriate corrections in 1-G → falls, broad-based gait, ataxia. Astronauts require physical assistance post-landing.
High-Yield Summary
  • Post-spaceflight: Otolith adapted to 0-G → gravitational signal 'unexpected' in 1-G → exaggerated tilt perception. Gait ataxia + elevated fall risk for days to weeks.
Objective 12.26

Describe how vestibular ocular reflexes are affected by a gravitational field after the vestibular system has adapted to weightlessness.

The otolith-VOR is recalibrated to a 0-G baseline during spaceflight. On return to Earth, the restored gravitational component produces inappropriate eye movements (tilt-induced nystagmus, ocular counterrolling) in response to head movements. Dynamic visual acuity (ability to see clearly during head movement) is reduced immediately post-landing. The canal-driven VOR is relatively better preserved. Recovery occurs over days to weeks as VOR recalibrates.

High-Yield Summary
  • Post-spaceflight VOR: Otolith-VOR recalibrated to 0-G → tilt-induced nystagmus + ↓ dynamic visual acuity in 1-G. Canal-VOR relatively preserved.
Objective 12.27

Describe the challenges associated with walking, running, and egress in a gravitational field after adaptation to weightlessness.

  • Gait ataxia: Broad-based, unsteady, heel-to-toe impaired. Combined effect of re-adapted vestibular system (false tilt perceptions) + impaired proprioceptive calibration (re-calibrated to 0-G) + muscle weakness/atrophy.
  • Elevated fracture risk: Reduced BMD + muscle weakness + vestibular ataxia = high fall risk during recovery.
  • Emergency egress impairment: Self-egress from spacecraft immediately post-landing may be impossible. Astronauts require crew assistance or rescue for initial mobility.
  • Recovery: Basic balance recovers in days to weeks; full neuromuscular performance may require 1–6 months.
High-Yield Summary
  • Post-spaceflight locomotion: Gait ataxia + high fall/fracture risk + impaired emergency egress.
  • Physical assistance required post-landing for long-duration missions.

SECTION E: CARDIOVASCULAR CHANGES (Objectives 12.28–12.33)

Objective 12.28

Describe the effects of the initial fluid shift due to weightlessness on stroke volume and heart size.

IMMEDIATE cardiovascular effect: HEADWARD FLUID SHIFT. On Earth, ~500–700 mL of blood pools in lower extremity veins. In 0-G, this pooling ceases → blood redistributes centrally:

  • Stroke volume: ↑ 20–40% in first hours (increased central venous pressure → increased preload → Frank-Starling → increased SV).
  • Heart size: Cardiac chambers transiently distend from increased preload → atrial stretch → ANP release → diuresis → plasma volume contracts 10–17% over 24–48 hours.
  • Appearance: 'Puffy face, bird legs'— facial/conjunctival edema, nasal congestion, thin lower extremities.
High-Yield Summary
  • Headward fluid shift (immediate): Lower extremity pooling ceases → ↑ central venous pressure → ↑ preload → ↑ stroke volume 20–40% → ANP → diuresis → plasma volume ↓ 10–17%.
  • Appearance: Puffy face, bird legs. Nasal congestion. Engorged jugular veins.
Objective 12.29

Explain the reason for the cardiac atrophy experienced by astronauts during extended space flight missions.

After the initial diuresis, plasma volume is chronically 10–17% below preflight. Reduced circulating volume → reduced cardiac preload. Additionally, no gravitational gradient exists against which the heart must pump blood — total cardiac work is substantially reduced. Like skeletal muscle, cardiac muscle is use-dependent: it atrophies proportional to the reduction in workload. Echocardiography has documented left ventricular mass reduction of approximately 8–12% after 6-month missions.

High-Yield Summary
  • Cardiac atrophy mechanism: Headward shift → diuresis → ↓ plasma volume → ↓ preload + ↓ cardiac workload → use-dependent LV mass ↓ (~8–12% after 6 months).
Objective 12.30

Describe the effects of weightlessness on plasma volume, hematocrit, and erythropoietin.

  • Plasma volume: DECREASES 10–17% over 24–48 hours (ANP-mediated diuresis). Remains reduced for the mission.
  • Hematocrit: Initially INCREASES (pseudo-hemoconcentration as plasma volume falls with initially unchanged RBC mass).
  • Erythropoietin: DECREASES — elevated hematocrit signals less RBC production needed. Reduced EPO → decreased erythropoiesis → neocytolysis (selective destruction of young red blood cells) → RBC mass falls ~10–15% → hematocrit normalizes despite contracted plasma volume.
High-Yield Summary
  • Weightlessness blood effects: ↓ plasma volume → ↑ hematocrit initially → ↓ EPO → neocytolysis → ↓ RBC mass (~10–15%) → hematocrit normalizes.
  • Neocytolysis: Selective destruction of young RBCs from reduced EPO stimulus.
Objective 12.31

Describe the effects of returning to a gravitational field after 9–14 days of weightlessness on maximal oxygen uptake, peak stroke volume, and cardiac output.

After even 9–14 days of spaceflight, return to Earth reveals significant cardiovascular deconditioning:

  • VO₂max: Decreases ~20–25% below preflight. Reduced cardiac output capacity + contracted plasma volume + muscle deconditioning.
  • Peak stroke volume: Reduced — lower preload (contracted plasma volume) + beginning cardiac atrophy + gravitational venous pooling in upright exercise.
  • Peak cardiac output: Reduced — reflects reduced stroke volume + impaired overall cardiac performance.
High-Yield Summary
  • Post-spaceflight cardiovascular (9–14 days): VO₂max ↓ 20–25% + Peak SV ↓ + Peak CO ↓. Longer missions = more pronounced deconditioning.
Objective 12.32

State the most likely contributor to the orthostatic intolerance experienced by those who have adapted to weightlessness and return to a gravitational field.

The most important contributor is REDUCED PLASMA VOLUME (10–17% below preflight). With less total circulating volume, the cardiovascular system has insufficient reserve to compensate for gravitational lower-extremity venous pooling that immediately occurs on standing after landing. Result: ↓ venous return → ↓ stroke volume → ↓ blood pressure → presyncope/syncope. Affects ~25% of short-mission and up to 80% of long-mission astronauts. Secondary contributors: impaired baroreflex sensitivity, reduced vascular tone, cardiac atrophy.

High-Yield Summary
  • Primary contributor to post-spaceflight orthostatic intolerance: REDUCED PLASMA VOLUME → inadequate compensation for gravitational venous pooling on standing.
  • Incidence: ~25% short missions; up to 80% long missions.
Objective 12.33

Describe lower body negative pressure and how it can be used as an orthostatic intolerance countermeasure during space flight.

LBNP applies sub-ambient pressure to the lower body in a sealed chamber, drawing blood into the lower extremities — simulating the orthostatic stress of gravity in 0-G. Daily LBNP sessions exercise the baroreflex by repeatedly challenging the cardiovascular system with orthostatic stress, maintaining baroreflex sensitivity and vascular tone. The Russian Chibis suit is the primary operational LBNP device, used combined with pre-landing fluid loading (salt tablets + water) to expand plasma volume before re-entry.

High-Yield Summary
  • LBNP: Negative pressure draws blood to lower extremities in 0-G → exercises baroreflex → maintains vascular responsiveness.
  • Russian Chibis suit: LBNP device; combined with fluid loading for pre-landing orthostatic intolerance prevention.

SECTION F: SPACE MOTION SICKNESS (Objectives 12.34–12.44)

Objective 12.34

Describe the most plausible motion sickness theory that encompasses almost all forms of motion sickness.

The SENSORY CONFLICT THEORY (neural mismatch hypothesis) is most broadly applicable. Motion sickness results when sensory inputs from visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems are internally inconsistent OR differ from the brain’s internal model prediction. In space: Canal-otolith conflict (otoliths lose gravitational reference → unexpected response to head movements) + visual-vestibular conflict. Head movements in pitch are the primary SMS triggers because they maximally engage the canal-otolith conflict in 0-G.

High-Yield Summary
  • Most plausible theory: Sensory conflict (neural mismatch). In space: Canal-otolith conflict (otolith loses gravity reference) + visual-vestibular conflict.
  • SMS trigger: Head movements (especially pitch) → maximal canal-otolith conflict in 0-G.
Objective 12.35

List the symptoms of motion sickness.

  • Stomach awareness (epigastric discomfort) — earliest symptom.
  • Nausea (may be severe; occurs in ~70% of astronauts early in flight).
  • Vomiting (~40–50% of astronauts; acute management critical in microgravity — aspiration hazard in 0-G).
  • Pallor, cold diaphoresis.
  • Headache.
  • Malaise, lethargy, reduced motivation.
  • Sopite syndrome: Drowsiness + cognitive impairment without frank nausea (operationally significant).
High-Yield Summary
  • SMS symptoms: Stomach awareness → nausea → vomiting (70%) → pallor + cold sweat + headache. Sopite syndrome: cognitive impairment without overt nausea.
Objective 12.36

Describe sopite syndrome and its possible operational impact on a space mission.

Sopite syndrome is a motion sickness variant characterized by drowsiness, fatigue, impaired motivation, and subtle cognitive degradation rather than frank nausea. In space, it may be more common in later mission phases when full vestibular adaptation has reduced overt nausea but subtle sensory conflict effects persist. Operationally, affected crew perform normally on self-paced routine tasks but show disproportionate degradation on sustained vigilance and emergency response tasks. They typically do not self-report impairment and do not appear classically sick — making the syndrome invisible to mission controllers without active screening.

High-Yield Summary
  • Sopite syndrome: Drowsiness + ↓ vigilance + ↓ emergency task performance WITHOUT nausea/vomiting.
  • Crew does not self-report; appears 'tired' not 'sick.' Disproportionate impact on vigilance-dependent tasks.
Objective 12.37

Compare the performance effects of motion sickness tasks requiring sustained attention and tasks that can be characterized as emergencies.

Research consistently shows a performance dissociation during motion sickness: sustained vigilance and monitoring tasks are severely degraded (autonomic arousal, subjective distress, and cognitive narrowing impair continuous attentional effort). Emergency and discrete high-urgency response tasks are substantially BETTER preserved — the acute stress arousal of an emergency provides a countervailing sympathetic performance enhancement. A crew member actively vomiting may still respond accurately and quickly to an alarm requiring a single decisive action.

High-Yield Summary
  • Sustained vigilance: Severely degraded during SMS. Emergency/discrete response: Relatively preserved (stress arousal compensates).
  • Implication: SMS crew can respond to emergencies but cannot reliably perform sustained monitoring.
Objective 12.38

Describe the effect of anticholinergics on motion sickness.

Anticholinergic drugs (primarily scopolamine) are the most effective single agents for motion sickness prophylaxis. Mechanism: muscarinic receptor blockade (M1/M2) in vestibular nuclei, cerebellum, and brainstem vomiting center — reducing the gain of emetic pathways for vestibular conflict signals. Side effects: drowsiness (central M1), dry mouth (salivary M3), mydriasis (pupil dilation; M3 ciliary ganglion), cycloplegia (impaired accommodation; M3 ciliary muscle), urinary retention, ↓ sweating, tachycardia (M2 SA node blockade). All side effects are dose-dependent and incompatible with aviation flying duties.

High-Yield Summary
  • Scopolamine mechanism: M1/M2 muscarinic blockade in vestibular nuclei/brainstem emetic center.
  • Key side effects: Drowsiness + dry mouth + MYDRIASIS (pupil dilation) + CYCLOPLEGIA (impaired accommodation) + urinary retention + tachycardia.
  • Incompatible with aviation flying duties; acceptable in space (non-flying operations).
Objective 12.39

Describe P6 pressure on motion sickness.

P6 acupressure (Neiguan point) is located on the palmar wrist ~3 finger-widths proximal to the wrist crease between the tendons of flexor carpi radialis and palmaris longus. Bilateral pressure via elastic bands or electronic wristbands (ReliefBand) has been studied as a non-pharmacological motion sickness intervention. Proposed mechanism: median nerve stimulation modulates brainstem nausea/vomiting centers. Evidence is mixed — some trials show modest nausea reduction; others show no benefit beyond placebo. Advantages: non-pharmacological, no side effects, no performance impairment, compatible with flying, can be combined with other countermeasures.

High-Yield Summary
  • P6 acupressure: Palmar wrist point (3 finger-widths from wrist crease). Median nerve stimulation → modulates brainstem nausea centers. Evidence mixed. Non-pharmacological; compatible with flying.
Objective 12.40

Identify the time course of space motion sickness.

  • Onset: Within 30 minutes to hours of entering orbit.
  • Peak severity: Days 1–3. ~67–70% experience nausea; ~40–50% vomit.
  • Resolution: Majority resolve by days 3–6. Some take up to 7–10 days.
  • Recurrence on return: Re-entry and return to 1-G can trigger a second SMS episode as the space-adapted vestibular system re-encounters gravity.
High-Yield Summary
  • SMS time course: Onset within 30 min–hours. Peak days 1–3 (70% nausea; 40–50% vomiting). Resolution by days 3–6. Recurrence possible at re-entry.
Objective 12.41

Describe the effectiveness of using pre-space flight adaptation training in the prevention of space motion sickness.

Pre-flight motion adaptation training has shown LIMITED effectiveness for SMS prevention. The 0-G sensory conflict is sufficiently novel and specific that no ground-based motion environment can fully simulate it for pre-adaptation. Parabolic flight (KC-135/C-9) provides only ~20-second 0-G intervals — insufficient duration for meaningful pre-adaptation. Exception: Space crew members represent a specific exception to the 'adapt rather than medicate' principle — because ground pre-adaptation cannot be reliably achieved, pharmacological SMS prophylaxis for re-entry IS appropriate for space crews (unlike pilots who should adapt through repeated exposure).

High-Yield Summary
  • Pre-flight SMS training: Limited effectiveness. 0-G environment too novel for ground pre-adaptation.
  • Space crews: Exception to 'adapt don’t medicate' rule — pharmacological prophylaxis for re-entry IS appropriate.
Objective 12.42

List the side effects of scopolamine.

Table 12.1. Scopolamine Side Effects by Organ System

Side EffectOrgan/SystemMechanism
Drowsiness / sedationCNSCentral M1 muscarinic blockade in reticular formation
Cognitive impairment (higher doses)CNSCentral M1 blockade in cortical processing areas
Mydriasis (pupillary dilation)EyePupillary sphincter M3 blockade → photophobia
Cycloplegia (impaired accommodation)EyeCiliary muscle M3 blockade → blurred near vision
Dry mouthSalivary glandsSalivary M3 blockade
Urinary retentionBladderDetrusor M3 blockade + internal sphincter constriction
Decreased sweating / flushingSkinEccrine sweat gland M3 blockade → impaired thermoregulation
TachycardiaHeartM2 blockade at SA node (removes vagal brake)
ConstipationGIGI smooth muscle M3 blockade
High-Yield Summary
  • Scopolamine side effects: Drowsiness + Dry mouth + MYDRIASIS + CYCLOPLEGIA + Urinary retention + ↓ sweating + Tachycardia + Constipation.
  • Aviation-incompatible: Drowsiness + Mydriasis + Cycloplegia (cannot read instruments; blinding glare).
Objective 12.43

Explain how scopolamine may interfere with the habituation to a sensory conflicting environment.

Scopolamine blocks muscarinic receptors in the cerebellar-vestibular pathways that process the sensory conflict signal required to drive CNS re-calibration. Habituation to a motion environment (long-term SMS prevention) requires the CNS to detect, quantify, and learn from sensory conflict through these cholinergic pathways. Scopolamine attenuates the conflict signal — the CNS receives a pharmacologically muted version and adapts more slowly. When the drug is discontinued, the unadapted conflict returns. For space crews who must ultimately work in the 0-G environment without medication, scopolamine provides acute relief at the cost of prolonged adaptation timeline.

High-Yield Summary
  • Scopolamine interferes with habituation: Blocks cholinergic conflict signal in cerebellar vestibular pathways → CNS cannot fully recalibrate → adaptation DELAYED.
  • Acute relief vs. prolonged adaptation trade-off. For long-duration missions, adaptation is preferred over chronic pharmacological dependence.
Objective 12.44

Identify drugs used to treat motion sickness.

Table 12.2. Drugs Used to Treat Space Motion Sickness

DrugClassRouteEfficacyNotes
Scopolamine (hyoscine)AnticholinergicOral; Transdermal patch; IVHigh (best single agent)Standard ISS pre-landing SMS prophylaxis. Patch preferred for sustained prophylaxis.
Promethazine (Phenergan)H1 antihistamine + anticholinergic + antidopaminergicOral; IM; Rectal suppositoryHighPRIMARY space SMS treatment when oral unavailable. IM 25 mg. Widely used on ISS. Significantly sedating.
Scopolamine + PromethazineAnticholinergic + antihistamineOral; IMHighest combinationUsed for severe SMS on ISS.
Meclizine (Antivert/Bonine)H1 antihistamineOralModerateLess sedating than promethazine. Used for mild SMS.
Dimenhydrinate (Dramamine)H1 antihistamine + anticholinergicOral; IMModerateSignificant sedation.
Scopolamine + Dextroamphetamine (scop-dex)Anticholinergic + stimulantOralHighest overallLimited by stimulant policy.
Ondansetron (Zofran)5-HT3 serotonin antagonistOral; IV; ODTModerateLess effective for vestibular motion sickness than for chemotherapy-induced nausea.
High-Yield Summary
  • Primary SMS treatment (when vomiting): IM promethazine (most used on ISS).
  • Best prophylaxis: Transdermal scopolamine or scopolamine + promethazine combination.
  • All effective SMS drugs: Incompatible with conventional flying duties.
  • Ondansetron: Less effective for motion sickness vs. chemotherapy-induced nausea (different mechanism).

More aerospace physiology topics